PMS vs Mutual Funds vs Alternate Investment Fund
Enclosed note contains our perspectives on suitability of PMS structure versus other investment vehicles.
Read MoreEnclosed note contains our perspectives on suitability of PMS structure versus other investment vehicles.
Read MoreThe price of Star Health corrected significantly from our first purchase price. We have continued to buy on the way down and are now at an 8% position weight.
Original investment thesis
The industry provides a rare combination of “win-win-win” business with growth longevity, a strong moat and healthy ROEs.
Silicon Valley Bank in the US has collapsed. SVB imploded as 3 risks collided
An article that explained what happened is enclosed.
Read MoreKama Holdings is the Holding company of SRF. Please read this important disclosure. 1
Summary thesis:
We invest primarily with an “ownership mindset” (~90-95% of portfolio).
However, ~5-10% allocation is kept for “Special Situations”.
Share price of Life Insurance companies have fallen 8-16% in last 2 days.
Life Insurance companies get almost 25-30% share of their total premiums from long duration savings products which enjoy tax benefits under Section 10 (10D) which make them superior products vs Debt instruments when measured on a post-tax basis.
The budget had 2 announcements with implications for Life Insurance companies:
We have put together a brief note to discuss our return expectations from Indian Equities.
Read MoreWe are investors in the Life Insurance space with 15-20% allocation. These names have seen a steep price correction over the last 12 months with some leading large caps down over 20-25%.
We take this opportunity to explain
Important Disclosure
Some basics of Life Insurance
The Life Insurance industry in India is a combination of 3 different products
Margins vary by product.
However, from a ROE perspective, the industry claims that each product is largely ROE neutral as ULIPs require lower capital (as risk to Insurance company for the same premium is lower).
Life insurers profits are evaluated based on concepts like “VNB”, “ROEV” and ‘EV” rather than EBITDA, PAT or ROE. This is because accounting in Life Insurance is tricky.
Some investors do not like the Life Insurance industry as all profitability is premised on assumptions. We are sympathetic to that argument but don’t share these concerns.
Why we like Life Insurance?
Partners are aware that we look for long duration, predictable compounding. Hence, we seek a large and growing market opportunity backed by a competitive edge.
Life Insurance companies are relatively early in their industry growth life cycle and a long runway for growth exists.
Pension/Annuity: Will benefit from rising retirement savings in India (Retirement corpus has grown from ~18% CAGR over FY10-20 driven by extension of National Pension Scheme (“NPS”) to all Indian citizens in 2009 along with tax exemptions offered). Regulatory changes in 2019 have created tailwinds for Annuity players, with increase in share of Pension that needs to be compulsory annuitized (estimates suggest ~20% of retirement funds need to be compulsory annuitized), more flexibility to buy Annuities from players other than existing Pension vendor (Life insurers manage < 10% of Pension funds FY20). While LIC currently dominates Annuity market, Private players are gaining market share and will benefit from industry tailwinds.2
Savings: While there is a clear trend of shift to Financial Assets from Physical Assets, Savings products offered by insurers compete with other products in the market. Hence the “right to win” for Insurance companies is not as strong.
We are more optimistic on prospects for Term protection and Annuity, which are expected to grow faster as they enjoy structural growth drivers and are categories where insurers enjoy regulatory moats. We see runway for 15%+ growth compounding for the next decade.
Leading players have a competitive edge
Not surprisingly, the leading private insurers (SBI Life, HDFC Life, ICICI Pru and Max Life) who are competitively placed in this industry in terms of brand trust and distribution strength have gained market share over the last few years while maintaining healthy ROEV.
Total market share of leading private insurers (SBI Life, HDFC Life, ICICI Pru and Max Life) has been consistently improving
Source: Spark Capital. New business premium (“NBP”) is Gross premium received for newly issued policies
Note: 5 Year avg ROEV is of FY18-FY22
Why are we investing through a basket approach?
We believe the sector will do well. Each company has certain business model advantages. We have different position weights reflecting our perspective on their strength vs entry valuations. Our stance also reflects our current inability to predict who will execute the best over time. However, over time as it becomes clear who the winners are, we intend to take more concentrated bets in those insurers.
What can explain poor recent share price performance?
Note: CMP is as of 16th Dec 2022 closing
No one really knows what causes stock prices to move the way they do in the short term. Our hypothesis is that there could be 3 reasons to explain current pessimism
Temporary challenges in Protection
The Protection industry was at a nascent stage few years back and witnessed very strong growth over 2015-21, however since the last ~1.5 years there has been a temporary slowdown due to the following challenges – Higher Reinsurance prices and stricter under writing requirements enforced by reinsurers. Life Insurance companies tend to use “Reinsurance”4, i.e. sell down their risk. Over the last few years, insurers had forayed outside of Metro/Tier 1 cities, however the reinsurance rates didn’t reflect this higher mortality risk. However due to covid, reinsurers faced high losses from higher claims, post which they revisited their pricing and increased it to reflect the higher mortality risk on the insurers book. A hike in re-insurance is akin to a hike in input costs. Reinsurance is only one part of the total cost structure 5for insurers, and insurers have managed higher Reinsurance rates by taking price hikes and increasing retention limits. This frequent price hikes and changes in under writing norms has made it challenging for distribution partners to sell protection, given push nature of the product. However, feedback from insurers is that despite higher prices, demand from customer continues to remain intact, and once situation on ground stabilizes, Protection growth is expected to recover.
Temporary challenges with Banca distribution channel
Leading private insurers have exposure of 30-65% from Banca channel 6 .This channel is expected to face temporary challenges over next few quarters as Banks prioritize deposit mobilisation over cross sell of insurance products as recent loan growth has been strong and excess liquidity on banks balance sheet has been utilised. However this issue should resolve over time as pace of loan growth normalizes and insurers keep adding non banca distribution partners over time.
Impact from rising interest rates
Insurance companies are valued based on Embedded Value. A 1% increase in Interest rates has a 4.2% impact on ICICI Pru’s Embedded Value, which assuming ~2.5x Mcap/EV should translate to ~10% one-time impact on share price.
Our investment stance at present
As can be seen from the chart below for ICICI Pru Life, Embedded Value growth has been broadly predictable and consistent while valuations tend to fluctuate basis prevailing sentiment.
Valuations today are very attractive across the board compared to historical benchmarks. Some names like HDFC Life & ICICI Pru are trading close to or below valuations of March 20 (Covid bottom).
MCAP/EV | |||||
Company Name | FY18 | FY20 | FY22 | H1FY23 | EV CAGR FY18-22 |
HDFC Life Insurance | 6 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 19% |
SBI Life Insurance | 3.5 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 18% |
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance | 3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 14% |
Max Financial Services | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 17% |
Note: H1FY23 Mcap is taken as of closing 16th Dec 2022
What returns could one earn from here over next 5 years? The future is unknowable. However, let’s examine what return scenarios could be for the next 5 years using very simple assumptions and ICICI Pru as an example. Assuming EV growth of 12% CAGR over FY23-28e (Lower than 14% EV CAGR over FY18-22) and valuation multiples continue to remain depressed, one can still earn ~14% IRR and so one is unlikely to lose capital even in pessimistic scenario. ICICI Pru historically has faced growth challenges due to constraints imposed by Primary banca partner 7and high ULIP exposure which faced cyclical challenges. However ICICI Pru today is much more derisked from both product and distribution perspective and well poised to grow. In Base-Bull scenario there is a roadmap to healthy 22-27% returns through a combination of growth improving and valuation re rating to fair levels.
ICICI Pru Life 5 year IRR scenarios
Scenarios | 5 yr EV Growth | Exit MCAP/EV FY 28e | IRR: FY 23- FY 28e |
Bear | 12% | 2.00 | 14% |
Base | 15% | 2.50 | 22% |
Bull | 18% | 2.75 | 27% |
Risks
Risk of higher corporate tax rates: Life insurers currently enjoy lower corporate tax rates as the Govt tries to incentivize higher insurance penetration. Currently there is no tax revision proposal in place, and we think it’s a low probability risk in the near to medium term. If and when tax rates normalize, there will be some impact on stock prices.
Asset Liability mismatch in guaranteed return products
Insurance companies sell some Guaranteed return Products which could create an Asset Liability Management risk for them if interest rates were to structurally decline in the economy as returns are guaranteed upfront while premiums are collected over time. One must note that this is not a concern at present as Interest rates in India are on a rising trajectory and Insurance companies claim that they hedge a very large portion of this business.
Impact from loss of exclusivity
ICICI Pru Life and SBI Life are subsidiaries of ICICI Bank and SBI respectively and currently enjoy an exclusive bank distribution relationship with their parent. 8In a situation where they are no longer subsidiaries, there is a risk of the Bank partner going open architecture (eg HDFC Bank at present) and resetting the pricing arrangement. The impact on margins is uncertain today, as it depends on ability of insurer to de risk over time, negotiations between Insurer and bank and insurers strategy on how much to pass on to customer.
LIC trades at a discount to private peers, Would we consider investing in LIC?
While LIC enjoys a trusted brand and strong agency network, we believe it is competitively disadvantaged versus private peers due to its Govt ownership. It has demonstrated poor product innovation (mix is dominated by Participatory products, with negligible share from growth categories like Protection etc.) and that has translated into a consistent market share decline over the years and poorer financial metrics vs private sector peers. Govt. intervention in LIC decisions can be seen from its decision to acquire ~51% stake in IDBI bank in 2019 – a move which can be interpreted as a bank bail out with no strategic benefit to LIC.
Basis our understanding at present, we will not consider LIC as an investment opportunity. We think long term and are not looking to trade for short term gains.
Summary
Our context
Team Lease – entered portfolio as Clear Leader
Performance reporting in the PMS industry had no standardized reporting till SEBI mandated managers to only report TWRR. (Time Weighted Rate of Return).
TWRR measures skill of a fund manager – TWRR does not care about quantum of money invested, only the return earned over the time period money was invested. It is calculated by multiplying returns over each time period money is invested and dividing it by the total time period. Alternatively, one can calculate this by assuming units are being issued at prevailing prices and calculating how the NAV of each units has evolved (MF method).
Read More